Canadian Health Coalition
  • Donate

    The form is not published.

  • Menu Canvas
    • Home
    • About us
      • Our Team
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Take action
    • Ways to Give
      • Give one-time
      • Become a monthly donor
      • Leave a gift in your will
      • Make a tribute donation
    • Contact
    • Donate
  • hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • 343-558-1788
Donate | Subscribe
    • English
    • Français (French)
Canadian Health Coalition
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Team
  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Take action
  • Ways to Give
    • Give one-time
    • Become a monthly donor
    • Leave a gift in your will
    • Make a tribute donation
  • Contact
  • Donate

New Brunswickers lobby for pharmacare as government reveals private health insurance interference

Homepage News New Brunswickers lobby for pharmacare as government reveals private health insurance interference
News

New Brunswickers lobby for pharmacare as government reveals private health insurance interference

September 17, 2025
By Tracy Glynn
0 Comment
1341 Views

Pharmacare advocates lobbying New Brunswick cabinet ministers this week have provoked a response from government that speaks to the power of the private health insurance industry.

New Brunswick Health Minister John Dornan told the New Brunswick Health Coalition and Canadian Health Coalition in a Saint John Liberal Caucus meeting on Monday that the health insurance industry may respond to pharmacare in New Brunswick by getting rid of private coverage for Ozempic, a medication used to lower blood sugar levels for people with Type-2 diabetes. And, if they did so, the province would be left with a $60 million gap in coverage because Ottawa does not currently plan to cover that medication. 

“What we understand is that [insurance companies] are threatening to not cover Ozempic for private plan holders, which would force the provincial government to shoulder that burden,” Steven Staples, National Director of Policy and Advocacy of the Canadian Health Coalition, told the NB Media Co-op.

The provincial government currently provides limited public coverage for Ozempic but it’s not on the list of medications that Ottawa says it will cover as part of its pharmacare deals with provinces and territories.

“The insurance companies are trying to strong-arm the government to stay out of the diabetes medication area,” Staples told the NB Media Co-op.

The Liberals promised free contraceptives in their 2024 election platform but has said little on diabetes coverage until now.

“While we support the principle of national pharmacare, the current federal proposal does not align with New Brunswick’s well-established and effective system,” the province said in a statement to the Telegraph-Journal.

The government comments are in response to a media conference organized by the health coalitions on Monday that announced this week’s effort to press the New Brunswick government to sign a pharmacare deal with Ottawa.

Jean-Claude Basque, co-chair of the New Brunswick Health Coalition, disagrees that the province has effective drug coverage. He told CBC, “New Brunswick’s drug plan has annual premiums of $60 to $2,700 dollars, plus co-pays, depending on a person’s income.”

New Brunswick resident Scott MacMillan got emotional when talking about how his daughter Rosie was airlifted to hospital when she was diagnosed with Type-1 diabetes as a toddler.

“She was fighting for her life and nearly died when she was 15 months old due to diabetes,” he said, as reported by CTV.

“This was a moment that we realized that Canada’s health care system is truly not universal,” he said, noting that life-sustaining treatments for Type-1 diabetes can cost upwards of $18,000 per year.

Scott MacMillan's daughter Rosemary in a hospital bed.
Scott MacMillan’s daughter Rosemary was diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes at 15 months old. MacMillan has since become an advocate of universal pharmacare. Photo from Scott MacMillan.

Sophie Lavoie of Reproductive Justice NB said the group wrote to Premier Holt in March, asking for the province to negotiate a pharmacare deal that includes contraceptives and diabetes medication.

“We join with Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights in being guided by the belief that everyone, regardless of where you live, what job you have, or what’s in your bank account, should have the ability to make autonomous decisions about their health and reproduction. Pharmacare legislation represents a major step forward for sexual and reproductive health and rights in Canada,” said Lavoie.

Lavoie added that the current lack of universal coverage in New Brunswick contributes to issues including unwanted pregnancies and costly hospitalizations.

Today, the Telegraph-Journal is reporting that the Progressive Conservatives and Greens are calling “the Holt government’s reluctance to sign a pharmacare deal with Ottawa because of its implications on the cost of diabetes drugs, describing the province’s recent comments as ‘incomprehensible’ and ‘shameful.’”

“It is incomprehensible that a government spokesperson told the media their priority was limited to securing funding for contraception, but not for diabetics,” Green Party Leader David Coon said in a press statement.

Coon added that more than 100,000 New Brunswickers live with diabetes, a number that’s expected to increase another 30 per cent in the next 10 years.

Three provinces and one territory — Manitoba, B.C., P.E.I. and Yukon — have inked pharmacare agreements with Ottawa since the Pharmacare Act became law last October.

A 2024 Environics poll revealed that New Brunswickers are among those who stand to benefit the most from pharmacare. Twenty-four per cent of New Brunswickers polled said they are not filling/renewing their prescription, or they are making it last longer (e.g., skipping doses, splitting pills) due to cost – the highest in Canada. Twenty-seven per cent said they hesitated about quitting/ changing jobs because of worries about losing prescription drug coverage – the highest in Canada.

Advocates are pointing out that New Brunswickers are not the only ones to suffer if the provinces does not include universal diabetes coverage as part of a pharmacare deal. They worry that it would set in a motion an erosion of the national plan with other provinces likely to follow suit. 

According to New Brunswick’s Lobby Registry, several pharmaceutical companies and private health insurance companies have met with the Health Department since pharmacare became law last October.

The lobby comes as pressure from Friends of Medicare in Alberta and the Canadian Health Coalition outside the national Liberal Caucus in Edmonton resulted in Prime Minister Mark Carney confirming last week that his government is committed to signing more pharmacare deals with provinces and territories.

Staples told CBC he is hopeful New Brunswick will become the fifth jurisdiction to sign a pharmacare deal. “I think New Brunswick can get a good deal.”

Tracy Glynn is the National Director of Projects and Operations for the Canadian Health Coalition
Tags: Pharmacare

Previous Story
“We’ll never stop agitating for expanded pharmacare,” says Don Davies
Next Story
People without contraception coverage may forgo it to pay for housing or groceries, say sexual health advocates

Related Articles

Expert committee calls for expansion of national universal pharmacare

The Canadian Health Coalition welcomes the Final Report of the...

Watch analysts break down what Budget 2025 means for public health care in Canada

Carney's first budget is not one for public health care

Recent Posts

  • Health Coalitions across Canada call on Prime Minister Mark Carney and Health Minister Marjorie Michel to uphold the Canada Health Act in the face of Alberta’s Law 11 Dec 16, 2025
  • Caring for care: Pat Armstrong and Hugh Armstrong talk about ‘the conditions of work are the conditions of care’ Dec 15, 2025
  • Alberta’s two-tier health care law threatens us all Dec 11, 2025
  • Among equals for health care: Canadian Health Coalition celebrates collaboration with Inter Pares Dec 10, 2025
  • Caring for care: A conversation with Pat Armstrong and Hugh Armstrong Dec 10, 2025

Tags

Canada Health Act Canada Health Transfer Canadian Health Coalition COVID-19 Dental Care Federal Election 44 Federal Election 45 Health+Hope 2025 Health Care Workers Health equity Health Policy Home care Long-term Care Medicare Mental Health Pharmacare Plasma Privatization Racism Reproductive Health Care Sexual and reproductive health and rights Solutions series Substance use care Toxic drug crisis
Canadian Health Coalition
2841 Riverside Dr.
Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8X7
+343.558.1788
hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Campaigns
  • News
  • Contact
SearchPostsLogin
Tuesday, 16, Dec
Health Coalitions across Canada call on Prime Minister Mark Carney and Health Minister Marjorie Michel to uphold the Canada Health Act in the face of Alberta’s Law 11
Monday, 15, Dec
Caring for care: Pat Armstrong and Hugh Armstrong talk about ‘the conditions of work are the conditions of care’
Thursday, 11, Dec
Alberta’s two-tier health care law threatens us all
Wednesday, 10, Dec
Among equals for health care: Canadian Health Coalition celebrates collaboration with Inter Pares
Wednesday, 10, Dec
Caring for care: A conversation with Pat Armstrong and Hugh Armstrong
Wednesday, 10, Dec
Advocates share strategies for saving Canada’s public health care

Welcome back,