Canadian Health Coalition
  • Donate
  • Menu Canvas
    • CHC Home
    • News
    • About us
    • Campaigns
    • Take action
    • Contact
  • hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • 343-558-1788
Donate OR Subscribe
    • English
    • Français (French)
Canadian Health Coalition
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Team
  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Take action
  • Contact
  • Donate

    Support the Canadian Health Coalition

    $
    Select Payment Method
    Personal Info

    Credit Card Info
    This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.

    Donation Total: $55.00 One Time

Align physician payment with teamwork and system improvement, part V

Homepage Analysis Align physician payment with teamwork and system improvement, part V
Analysis

Align physician payment with teamwork and system improvement, part V

March 21, 2023
By Andrew Longhurst
0 Comment
129 Views

This is the fifth part of a series examining the policy barriers and solutions to reducing surgical wait times in Canada. The series has been adapted from a research paper by Andrew Longhurst. The complete paper with reference list for the footnotes is available here.

A key advantages in many high-performing health systems is that specialists and surgeons receive salaries and work directly for the regional health authorities; unlike in Canada, they are not independent, fee-for-service contractors, effectively running small businesses.[1] In Canada in 2017/18, 73 per cent of total clinical payments to physicians were fee-for-service, and only to 27 per cent were through alternative payment models (e.g., salary, capitation, sessional payment).[2] Only 8 per cent of surgeons derived more than half of their total clinical payments from alternative payment methods, which is notably lower than family medicine and other medical specialities.[3]

  • Read more of the Solutions Series: Andrew Longhurst presents an 11-part series on ways to reduce surgical wait times in Canada

Alternatives to fee-for-service compensation – including salaried, capitated or blended payment – would help streamline waitlists and referral processes by shifting these responsibilities from individual surgeons to health authorities. As Toronto surgeon David Urbach and family physician Danielle Martin write in a Canadian Medical Association Journal commentary, some surgeons are reluctant “to give up control of their larger blocks of operating-room time, which allows them to do more procedures and earn more money.”[4] Some surgeons oppose team-based models of care because they view it as a threat to their fee-for-service billings,[5] even though there is no shortage of work to go around. Team-based care would allow surgeons to focus their time performing surgeries and consulting with patients who actually require surgery. But as health policy analysts Steven Lewis and Terrence Sullivan have noted, “doing routine work efficiently is more lucrative than solving complex problems, which drives specialists to work at the lower end of their capabilities.”[6]

In recent decades, many jurisdictions have moved away from fee-for-service payment since it favours practitioner autonomy and over-servicing at the expense of teamwork, cost-containment, and system improvement.[7]

Andrew Longhurst is a health policy researcher and political economist at Simon Fraser University

[1] Longhurst et al., 2016.

[2] CIHI 2019d, p. 31.

[3] CIHI, 2019d, p. 33.

[4] Bains, 2020.

[5] Longhurst et al., 2016, p. 33.

[6] Lewis and Sullivan, 2013b.

[7] Grant and Hurley, 2013; Lewis and Sullivan, 2013a, 2013b; Shroeder and Frist, 2013; Cohen, 2014; Marchildon and Sherar, 2018; Longhurst, 2019.

Tags: Solutions series

Previous Story
Government leadership can scale-up system improvements: Solutions series, part IV
Next Story
Government must support access to medicine, not big pharma: Singh

Related Articles

It’s about more than just money, part XI

Solutions Series: Andrew Longhurst presents an 11-part series on ways...

Reduce inappropriate medical imaging and surgeries, part X

Solutions Series: Andrew Longhurst presents an 11-part series on ways...

Recent Posts

  • Budget 2023 overlooks Canada’s “dirty little secret” about federal health funding May 23, 2023
  • Canadians have three times more medical debt than Australians: poll May 23, 2023
  • Health and Hope Lobby 2023: What we heard and what’s next May 17, 2023
  • Those who suffer the most are the most vulnerable: Dakota Tipi Chief on racism in health care May 17, 2023
  • What the end of the Cambie legal saga means for public health care May 10, 2023

Tags

Canada Health Transfer Canadian Health Coalition COVID-19 Dental Care Federal Election 44 Health+Hope 2025 Health Care Workers Health Policy Home care Long-term Care Medicare Mental Health Pharmacare Plasma Privatization Racism Reproductive Health Care Solutions series
Canadian Health Coalition
116 Albert St. Suite 300
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5G3
+343.558.1788
hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • Home
  • What we do
  • Campaigns
  • News
  • Contact

Find posts prior to January 1, 2021
SearchPostsLogin
Tuesday, 23, May
Budget 2023 overlooks Canada’s “dirty little secret” about federal health funding
Tuesday, 23, May
Canadians have three times more medical debt than Australians: poll
Wednesday, 17, May
Health and Hope Lobby 2023: What we heard and what’s next
Wednesday, 17, May
Those who suffer the most are the most vulnerable: Dakota Tipi Chief on racism in health care
Wednesday, 10, May
What the end of the Cambie legal saga means for public health care
Wednesday, 10, May
Council of Canadians raising the political temperature for public pharmacare

Welcome back,