Canadian Health Coalition
  • Donate

    The form is not published.

  • Menu Canvas
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Team
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Take action
    • Ways to Give
      • Give one-time
      • Become a monthly donor
      • Leave a gift in your will
      • Make a tribute donation
    • Contact
    • Donate
  • English
  • hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • 343-558-1788
Donate | Subscribe
    • English
Canadian Health Coalition
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Team
  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Take action
  • Ways to Give
    • Give one-time
    • Become a monthly donor
    • Leave a gift in your will
    • Make a tribute donation
  • Contact
  • Donate

Eyes on Ontario after BC slams door on for-profit plasma collection

Homepage Commentary Eyes on Ontario after BC slams door on for-profit plasma collection
Commentary

Eyes on Ontario after BC slams door on for-profit plasma collection

April 26, 2023
By Steven Staples
0 Comment
1928 Views

Advocates for Canada’s safe and voluntary blood supply are focussing their attention on the Ontario government. BloodWatch and Canadian Blood Services staff, who are members of OPSEU, are lobbying MLAs in Queen’s Park this week to enforce the ban on the commercial collection of plasma and keep multinational Grifols out of the province.

@C_Mulroney We are very happy your cabinet chose to not repeal the law we had passed unanimously. But we are troubled to learn that the decision was to then be passive & permit a company to come in & exploit vulnerable populations to sell their plasma. Patients have a right pic.twitter.com/0CFbs5cDBb

— BloodWatch.org (@BloodWatchOrg) April 26, 2023

Ontario and B.C. both ban the commercial collection of plasma, but Canadian Blood Services has argued the laws leave loopholes that allow its commercial partner, Grifols, to open commercial plasma collection sites in those provinces. Quebec also has a ban in place.

The Canadian Health Coalition, BloodWatch, NUPGE, OPSEU, and others rallied outside CBS headquarters in December opposing the announcement that the non-profit agency would work with Grifols to collect plasma in Canada. Supporters of Canada’s safe, voluntary blood system are concerned that paying plasma donors, as Grifols does, could undermine essential voluntary blood donations and take advantage of economically disadvantaged people.

A showdown has been brewing for months between CBS and Grifols on one hand, B.C. and Ontario on the other, over whether the provinces would uphold the bans despite CBS’s assertions the laws do not apply to CBS and its contract with Grifols.

B.C. slammed the door on CBS and Grifols this month. The law “was not intended to allow a private entity to establish collection sites in B.C. with a donor remuneration model,” B.C. Health Ministry spokesperson Hope Latham said in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail, adding: “We do not anticipate that Grifols would be operating sites in British Columbia.”

Ontario’s Conservative government has been far less clear than its NDP counterpart in B.C. In a letter to the Canadian Health Coalition, Ontario’s Deputy Premier and Health Minister Sylvia Jones wrote, “The ministry will continue to prioritize the safety of patients as we monitor CBS’s approach to plasma collection in Canada.”

The Globe and Mail discovered through documents obtained through an access-to-information request that the Ontario government considered lifting its ban last fall, but ultimately decided to leave it in place. Bloodwatch stated in a Twitter post, “We are troubled to learn that the decision was to then be passive & permit a company to come in & exploit vulnerable populations to sell their plasma.”

Steven Staples is the National Director of Policy and Advocacy for the Canadian Health Coalition
Tags: Plasma

Previous Story
Surgeries cost up to 150 per cent more in private clinics: Quebec study
Next Story
It’s about more than just money, part XI

Related Articles

Plasma donations should be voluntary: Canadian Health Coalition tells Canadian Blood Services board

If most countries don't allow paid plasma, why does Canada?

Ban paid plasma and end Grifols contract, say health care advocates

"Private for profit pay-for-plasma should not be allowed anywhere in...

Recent Posts

  • New legal opinion: Alberta’s Bill 11 regulations fail to fix two-tier health care scheme Jul 15, 2026
  • It’s time for Carney and Michel to act on Bill 11 Jul 8, 2026
  • Premiers to be told to stop two-tier health care at their Charlottetown meeting Jun 26, 2026
  • Time is up: Health Minister Marjorie Michel must respond to Alberta’s Bill 11 announcement Jun 18, 2026
  • Plasma donations should be voluntary: Canadian Health Coalition tells Canadian Blood Services board Jun 18, 2026

Tags

Bill 11 Canada Health Act Canada Health Transfer Canadian Health Coalition COVID-19 Dental Care Federal Election 44 Federal Election 45 Health+Hope 2025 Health Care Workers Health equity Health Policy Home care Long-term Care Medicare Mental Health Pharmacare Plasma Privatization Racism Reproductive Health Care Sexual and reproductive health and rights Solutions series Substance use care Toxic drug crisis

[custom-twitter-feeds showbutton=false creditctf=false]

Canadian Health Coalition
2841 Riverside Dr.
Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8X7
+343.558.1788
hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Campaigns
  • News
  • Contact
SearchPostsLogin
Wednesday, 15, Jul
New legal opinion: Alberta’s Bill 11 regulations fail to fix two-tier health care scheme
Wednesday, 8, Jul
It’s time for Carney and Michel to act on Bill 11
Friday, 26, Jun
Premiers to be told to stop two-tier health care at their Charlottetown meeting
Thursday, 18, Jun
Time is up: Health Minister Marjorie Michel must respond to Alberta’s Bill 11 announcement
Thursday, 18, Jun
Plasma donations should be voluntary: Canadian Health Coalition tells Canadian Blood Services board
Wednesday, 17, Jun
Canadian Dental Care Plan looks good on paper but experiences of seniors, immigrants tell a different story: advocates

Welcome back,