Canadian Health Coalition
  • Donate
  • Menu Canvas
    • CHC Home
    • News
    • About us
    • Campaigns
    • Contact
  • hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • 613-699-9898
Donate OR Subscribe
    • English
Canadian Health Coalition
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Team
  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Contact
  • Donate

    Support the Canadian Health Coalition

    $
    Select Payment Method
    Personal Info

    Credit Card Info
    This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.

    Donation Total: $25.00 One Time

Considering Québec’s version of pharmacare

Homepage Commentary Considering Québec’s version of pharmacare
Commentary

Considering Québec’s version of pharmacare

February 15, 2022
By CDN Health Coalition
0 Comment
388 Views

Twenty-five years ago, in June of 1996, the Parti Québécois government set up the first pharmacare programme in North America.

The PQ government promised a universally accessible low cost program based on the income of the individual. It covered the 1.2 million working people who had no coverage for medication. Today the program covers 1.8 million people. The number on Line 447 of the Quebec income tax form defines what taxpayers with no workplace coverage have to pay.

Then Health Minister Jean Rochon, (who died in 2021), told La Presse that in 1970 when medicare was introduced in Quebec, medication wasn’t as central to health care as it has become. Rochon was convinced that the costs of the new pharmacare programme would be recouped by the reduced costs of outpatient medicine, since fewer people would be in hospital.

Small insurance companies were opposed as were the drug companies.

A compromise was struck. Those who have workplace insurance coverage-roughly 60% of the population- would keep it. Those who have no work place coverage are covered by the public program, paid for by a contribution via taxes, and a fee when medication was dispensed. The program would be administered by the private sector. Those deemed vulnerable are automatically covered: welfare recipients, the chronically ill and the elderly on low incomes.

 “Under the Quebec plan deductibles and co-pays can total nearly $1200 annually. Thousands of patients go without their medicines because they can’t afford them. Overall Quebec has a highly fragmented system that results in the highest per capita costs among all provinces,” says Keith Newman, a member of the board of the Canadian Health Coalition.

According to Newman, the Quebec model should not be implemented in Canada. “It would perpetuate high costs to patients and employers and exclude hundreds of thousands of patients who would be unable to afford the medicines they need. It would also prevent proper bargaining for drug prices, ensuring Canada continues to have the second or third highest drug costs per capita in the OECD.”

The solution is clearly explained in the 2019 Hoskins Report.

When the report came out Dr. Eric Hoskins, the former Health Minister of Ontario told the CBC “Let’s complete the unfinished business of universal health care. That can be our promise and our legacy to each other and to all future generations.”

Hoskins recommended that Canada and Québec follow the examples of Sweden, Australia and France, among others.

Once fully implemented, the Hoskins report predicts the amount spent on prescription drugs in Canada would drop by roughly $5 billion a year. In order to get that point the report recommends the creation of a new national arm’s-length agency to manage prescription medications by negotiating prices, and creating a formulary, or list, of approved, covered drugs.

Over 500 groups in Quebec are pushing for a fully public system.

Assurance médicaments
Tags: Pharmacare

Previous Story
Attach stronger strings to federal health funding for provinces, say Canada’s health care unions
Next Story
Health Coalition seeks progress on Safe Long-Term Care Act in Budget 2022

Related Articles

Canadians want it, doctors want it, so let’s get pharmacare done

1,000 experts sign petition to Canada’s Prime Minister

Doing pharmacare with Don Davies MP, Brendan Hanley MP and Linda Silas, CFNU

A special presentation by the Pearson Centre for Progressive Policy,...

Recent Posts

  • Québec Coroner calls for “deprivatization” of long-term care facilities May 18, 2022
  • Health Coalition team expands with the addition of two new staff members May 18, 2022
  • Canadians want it, doctors want it, so let’s get pharmacare done May 11, 2022
  • More federal funding needed to end troubling backlogs, says Health Coalition May 11, 2022
  • Results of elections could determine the future of the care economy, says Care Economy Group May 4, 2022

Tags

Canada Health Transfer Canadian Health Coalition COVID-19 Federal Election 44 Health care workers Health policy Long-term care Mental health Pharmacare Privatization Racism

Cdn Health CoalitionFollow

Cdn Health Coalition

Report: Careless Profits: Diverting public money from long-term care in Ontario https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resource/report-careless-profits-diverting-public-money-long-term-care-ontario

Reply on Twitter 1527309664936988672Retweet on Twitter 15273096649369886722Like on Twitter 15273096649369886722
Canadian Health Coalition
116 Albert St. Suite 300
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5G3
+613.699.9898
hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • Home
  • What we do
  • Campaigns
  • News
  • Contact

Find posts prior to January 1, 2021
SearchPostsLogin
Wednesday, 18, May
Québec Coroner calls for “deprivatization” of long-term care facilities
Wednesday, 18, May
Health Coalition team expands with the addition of two new staff members
Wednesday, 11, May
Canadians want it, doctors want it, so let’s get pharmacare done
Wednesday, 11, May
More federal funding needed to end troubling backlogs, says Health Coalition
Wednesday, 4, May
Results of elections could determine the future of the care economy, says Care Economy Group
Thursday, 28, Apr
Doing pharmacare with Don Davies MP, Brendan Hanley MP and Linda Silas, CFNU

Welcome back,