Canadian Health Coalition
  • Donate

    The form is not published.

  • Menu Canvas
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Team
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Take action
    • Ways to Give
      • Give one-time
      • Become a monthly donor
      • Leave a gift in your will
      • Make a tribute donation
    • Contact
    • Donate
  • English
  • Français (French)
  • hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • 343-558-1788
Donate | Subscribe
    • English
    • Français (French)
Canadian Health Coalition
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Team
  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Take action
  • Ways to Give
    • Give one-time
    • Become a monthly donor
    • Leave a gift in your will
    • Make a tribute donation
  • Contact
  • Donate

Public health advocates cut through election spin over public vs. private health care

Homepage Analysis Public health advocates cut through election spin over public vs. private health care
Analysis

Public health advocates cut through election spin over public vs. private health care

August 24, 2021
By CDN Health Coalition
0 Comment
4824 Views

The impact of for-profit health care on our public health care system took centre-stage this week in the federal election, and journalists called upon public health advocates to sort through the spin.

The Canadian Health Coalition provided analysis to well-known Ottawa-based reporter for the Toronto Star, Tonda MacCharles, who was writing about Liberals’ claims that the Conservatives supported two-tier, privatized health care.  

  • Read “Who would protect medicare — and who would trash it? Federal parties are fighting it out with competing visions of Canadian health care” by Tonda MacCharles in the Toronto Star

We were asked to comment on the role health care was playing amongst the parties.

“Clearly, the failure of private, for-profit, long-term-care facilities as exposed during the pandemic has to be corrected,” National Director of Policy and Advocacy Steve Staples said. “And the NDP is addressing it by phasing out long-term care in favour of the other two (kinds): public or non-profit. Conservatives seem to want to go in the opposite direction. And the Liberals don’t seem to be addressing the elephant in the room, which is the for-profit providers.”

On the same issue of public vs private health care, Canadian Press Parliamentary reporter Joan Bryden asked public health care advocates to assess a controversial interview of Conservative Party Leader Erin O’Toole from 2020.

Watch the controversial 2020 interview with Conservative Party Leader Erin O’Toole

Bryden asked, “Can O’Toole support private health care within universal public system?” as he states in the video? Both Canadian Doctors for Medicare’s Dr. Melanie Bechard, and the Canadian Health Coalition’s Steve Staples replied that he cannot.

“I would say that introducing more private pay into the health system undermines our universal public health care, regardless of whether or not you’re saying you’re still going to allow for universal access,” said Dr. Bechard.

  • Read “Truth Test: Can O’Toole support private health care within universal public system?” by Joan Bryden

The Canadian Health Coalition pointed to the British Columbia Supreme Court ruling last September. Justice Steeves found, “that increases in privatization will not only benefit those who can afford to jump the queue, but it increases inequalities in the system, in particular by lengthening wait times for everybody else,” said Staples. “By increasing for-profit players into the health-care system, you will create a greater two-tier system.”

Bryden’s conclusion? “O’Toole has not explained how his support for allowing private, for-profit medical services squares with his assertion that he fully supports universal, public health care. Public health-care advocates say he can’t have it both ways,” she wrote.

Tags: Federal Election 44 Privatization

Previous Story
Federal workers put health care at top of election priorities
Next Story
Call on candidates to bring LTC within public health care: Labour Congress

Related Articles

'We deserve better.' Health coalitions call on premiers to protect public health care in the face of two-tier threat

Premiers call on feds to renew health care funding as...

New legal opinion: Alberta's Bill 11 regulations fail to fix two-tier health care scheme

Canadian Health Coalition calls on Prime Minister Carney and Health...

Recent Posts

  • National Day of Action calls for urgent federal action against two-tier, American-style health care Sep 1, 2026
  • PM Carney must enforce the Canada Health Act on Bill 11, new poll finds Aug 24, 2026
  • Join the September 1st Day of Action Against U.S.-Style Health Care Aug 19, 2026
  • Canadian Health Coalition welcomes pause of Grifols operations, renews call to end for-profit plasma collection Aug 18, 2026
  • Health Canada reports show paid plasma is not safe Aug 5, 2026

Tags

Bill 11 Canada Health Act Canada Health Transfer Canadian Health Coalition COVID-19 Dental Care Federal Election 44 Federal Election 45 Health+Hope 2025 Health Care Workers Health equity Health Policy Home care Long-term Care Medicare Mental Health Pharmacare Plasma Privatization Racism Reproductive Health Care Sexual and reproductive health and rights Solutions series Substance use care Toxic drug crisis

[custom-twitter-feeds showbutton=false creditctf=false]

Canadian Health Coalition
2841 Riverside Dr.
Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8X7
+343.558.1788
hello@healthcoalition.ca
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Campaigns
  • News
  • Contact
SearchPostsLogin
Tuesday, 1, Sep
National Day of Action calls for urgent federal action against two-tier, American-style health care
Monday, 24, Aug
PM Carney must enforce the Canada Health Act on Bill 11, new poll finds
Wednesday, 19, Aug
Join the September 1st Day of Action Against U.S.-Style Health Care
Tuesday, 18, Aug
Canadian Health Coalition welcomes pause of Grifols operations, renews call to end for-profit plasma collection
Wednesday, 5, Aug
Health Canada reports show paid plasma is not safe
Monday, 27, Jul
‘We deserve better.’ Health coalitions call on premiers to protect public health care in the face of two-tier threat

Welcome back,